The V-safe Data Bombshell
One of the latest “bombshells” to hit the Covid vaccine world is the release of the V-Safe data accumulated by the Centre for Disease Control (CDC).
What is V-safe?
It is a voluntary safety monitoring program run by the CDC to track adverse reactions after taking the Covid vaccines. The program can be found here.
Taken from the V-safe webpage,
“V-safe provides personalized and confidential health check-ins via text messages and web surveys so you can quickly and easily share with CDC how you, or your dependent, feel after getting a COVID-19 vaccine. This information helps CDC monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in near real time.”
Doesn’t the CDC also run the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)? Why run the V-Safe program?
VAERS is a PASSIVE surveillance reporting system where medical people and laymen can report adverse reactions. V-safe is different as it is a more ACTIVE surveillance system, in that the CDC is actively seeking out those that have registered for the program to see if any adverse reactions have occurred. VAERS reports are not actively sought by the CDC, rather they are only reported at the discretion of the medical person or the person who experienced the reaction.
The V-Safe is a more user-friendly program run via smartphone through web surveys & text messages. VAERS is a less user-friendly system requiring specific details which the average person has to work at to obtain. If a serious event is reported to V-safe, you will get a phone call encouraging you to report to VAERS.
Overall, the design of the V-safe program creates a much higher level of reporting whereas the VAERS program is known as being highly underreported. As a result, the V-safe program gives a MUCH MORE ACCURATE picture of the level of safety of the vaccine. More to say about that later.
Why have most not heard of V-safe or seen the data?
The V-safe data has been hidden until recently, when ICAN’s attorney Aaron Siri, finally obtained the V-safe data after demands, appeals, and 2 lawsuits. All in all, it took Siri 463 days after the first request to finally access the V-safe data from the CDC. Listen to Siri’s statement regarding this,
“It took numerous legal demands, appeals and two lawsuits, and over a year, but the CDC finally capitulated and agreed to a court order requiring them to do what they should have done from day one, release the V-safe data to the public,”
The VAERS data, to the contrary, is easily accessible here. or in a summarized version here
When this data was requested, the CDC ignored the requests. The only reason the public has access to this data is due to Aaron Siri’s determined lawsuits. That clearly doesn’t inspire confidence in the transparency of the CDC.
Why didn’t the CDC voluntarily release this data like they do with VAERS?
To be simple and blunt, the data is horrible. If you thought the VAERS data was disturbing, wait till you hear the V-safe data. Again, the V-safe data gives a much more accurate picture as to the true safety of these vaccine products. If you think our regulatory agencies (ie. CDC, FDA, NIH, WHO, HHS, etc…) are completely transparent, I’m sorry to burst your bubble, but this is simply not the case. All these agencies have pushed the covid vaccines and when one looks closely at their funding, they are all captured by the pharmaceutical industry. They have a lot to lose by releasing this data in terms of credibility and liability.
Let’s get to the V-safe data
ICAN has reviewed the V-safe data and has provided a dashboard summary page here
What are the important points to notice here?
There are 10,108,273 people registered in the program, that is a very large sample of people. Of these, 3,353,110 people reported they were adversely impacted by the vaccine. That is a whopping 33.2% of those registered who were either unable to do normal activities, unable to go to work, or needed medical care.
When looking at the more serious category, “needed medical care”, there were 782,913 individuals impacted. That is also a huge 7.7% of individuals who had a severe enough reaction requiring medical care!! For comparison, according to the worldometer tracking system, of the 13,729,132 active Covid cases in the world, only 38,692 (0.3%) are in serious or critical condition. 99.7% are in mild condition. So then,
the Covid vaccines were over 25 times (7.7%/0.3%) more likely to produce a serious reaction than the Covid sickness.
There were 13,963 children under 3 years of age registered in the V-safe program. Of those children, 3009 children (21.5%) reported an adverse reaction, and 1009 children (7.2%) reported a serious reaction requiring medical attention. To put this in perspective, young people are at far lower risk of severe outcome from Covid disease than the average person. If you view the graph from the Province of Manitoba Health data, the deaths, ICU admissions and hospitalizations are very rare for those under 9 years of age. So small they barely register on the graph. Again, the covid vaccine at 7.2%, sends far more young people to medical care than the Covid disease, which according to this graph would be around 2% of all hospital admissions. This begs a serious question, why vaccinate anyone under the age of 60 if around 90% of covid deaths are over 60 years of age?
4.
In terms of Vaccine Brand, this is the breakdown of the reactions. Moderna 49%, Pfizer 43%, J&J 5%, other 4%. So Moderna produced the highest number of reactions. To compound this, Moderna has only been used by 38% of the US population,
so Moderna vaccinees (38% of vaccinees in USA) accounted for 49% of V-Safe reactions.
This should not be surprising as each Moderna dose has 100 micrograms of mRNA material whereas each Pfizer dose has 30 micrograms, so more than 3 times as many spike proteins unleashed in the body.
In terms of serious reaction requiring medical care, Moderna accounted for 45% and Pfizer accounted for 46%, so given Moderna accounts for 38% of US vaccinees, Moderna also gives a disproportionately higher level of severe reactions.
covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-onedose-pop-12yr
https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-administration/
https://www.icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
The CDC stopped pushing this system around May 2021.
You can see this using the graph which shows the registered users by month, with a sharp decrease in new users around May 2021. The CDC clearly knew something was not looking good around this time, and the push to find new users dramatically decreased. A typical move by the CDC, when things don’t look good, stop collecting the data. This was before the booster were rolled out, which have since shown the highest levels of adverse reactions. Read some of my other posts for this info. So, in reality, the numbers now would be far worse.
What else can be drawn from the V-safe data?
Given that V-safe is a much more accurate record of the adverse reactions from the Covid vaccines as it has a very high level of reporting, we can then compare the V-safe results to the VAERS records to see how underreported VAERS is. If one can calculate the underreporting factor of VAERS, that will give a clearer picture of safety of the Vaccine.
What is VAERS showing?
If you go to https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
Click on the Tabulate drop down menu. Select “Event Outcome”.
Then go to #3 Vaccine Information. Select to highlight “Covid19(Covid-19)” under the Vaccine options.
Then click on any of the “Find” buttons on the right side of the screen. This is what will popup.
Another option to view VAERS data in a summary form is https://openvaers.com/covid-data
Let’s do a summary of openvaers.
Deaths 31,330
hospitalizations 179,806
urgent care 135,486
doctor office visit 207,576
anaphylaxis 10,064
bell’s palsy 16,104
miscarriages 5,078
heart attacks 16,830
myocarditis/pericarcarditis 52,896
permanently disabled 58,630
thrombocytopenia/low platelet 9,108
life threatening 34,304
severe allergic reaction 44,999
shingles 14,830
Let’s use V-safe to get a rough idea of the underreporting factor of VAERS
To explain this. The V-safe program showed that 33.2% of the people had a reportable adverse reaction. With regards to VAERS there have so far been 1,424,789 reportable adverse reactions. There are 264,562,221 vaccinated people in the USA. If you make a simple calculation 1,424,789/264,562,221, you get a 0.54% reporting rate per person for VAERS.
If V-safe shows a vaccine adverse event reporting rate of 33.2% and VAERS shows a 0.54% reporting rate. Now we can calculate a rough underreporting factor. 33.2%/0.54% = 61.6. So, if VAERS is reporting 1,424,789 adverse reaction reports,
the real impact if you apply this underreporting factor, is more like 87,767,002 (1,424,789 x 61.6) adverse reactions in the USA from the Covid Vaccines.
That is pretty massive, and it doesn’t account for the increased level of adverse events from the boosters.
Let’s look at the serious events requiring medical care
VAERS records events which require medical care. Hospitalizations, Urgent Care, and Doctor Visits.
V-safe showed a 7.7% reporting rate of serious events requiring medical care.
If we look at VAERS reports requiring medical care
hospitalizations 179,806
urgent care 135,486
doctor office visits 207,576
These total 523,868 serious events requiring medical attention. If there are 264,562,221 vaccinated people in the USA, that works out to a rate of 0.2 serious events requiring medical care per person.
If we divide the V-safe reporting rate by the VAERS reporting rate 7.7%/0.2% you get an underreporting factor of 39.1 for SERIOUS EVENTS. So, it would appear that serious events are more reported than mild adverse events into VAERS. If we apply that underreporting factor to the serious events we get this:
Deaths 31,330 x 39.1 = 1,225,003 deaths
hospitalizations 179,806 x 39.1 = 7,030,414 hospitalizations
urgent care 135,486 x 39.1 = 5,297,502 urgent care visits
doctor office visits 207,576 x 39.1 = 8,116,221 doctor office visits
Now that is a humungous level of pressure on our healthcare system from the vaccine itself (not the disease)!! Some might say, “Brent, there is no way the serious vaccine reactions are that large”. I realize the media has this locked up tight, but if you follow the data, this is where you go. Didn’t Biden say this was a pandemic of the “unvaccinated”?
Others with PhD’s have looked at calculating the URF (underreporting factor) for VAERS and have come up with numbers in the low 40’s, so I’m in the same ballpark. Even if the URF is conservatively lower, let’s say 30, the numbers are still very bad.